Skip to main content

Asset And Xontext (context) Transfers ( 1 )

Technical Specification: Xythum Protocol for Asset and Context Transfer
Version: 2.0
Authored by Xythum Labs

Abstract​

Xythum Labs introduces a novel cross-chain interoperability protocol enabling asset transfers (token/value movement between chains) and context transfers (arbitrary data/state synchronization) through a decentralized, trustless architecture. By combining FROST threshold signatures, a distributed state ledger (SyncNet), and a programmable virtual machine (XythumVM) with a domain-specific language (XythumDSL), Xythum achieves sub- 1 5 -second finality for asset transfers and sub- 5 -second cross-chain event propagation. This document details the technical implementation of Xythum’s cross-chain infrastructure, focusing on its cryptographic primitives, network architecture, and developer tooling for building multichain applications.

** 1 . Introduction**​

Blockchain ecosystems suffer from fragmentation, with $3T in total value locked (TVL) siloed across 1 5 0+ incompatible networks. Existing bridges operate as centralized custodians (e.g., 67% of cross-chain TVL relies on 9-node multisigs) or suffer from latency (3–30 minutes) and MEV vulnerabilities. Xythum redefines interoperability through:

  • Asset Transfers: Non-custodial cross-chain swaps in 5 – 1 5 seconds via FROST signatures.
  • Context Transfers: Generalized smart contract communication across chains via gateway contracts and XythumDSL.
  • SyncNet: A verifiable UTXO-style ledger for transparent state management.

Fee market based on SyncNet state storage and MPCaaS compute units.

Definitions​

2. 1 Asset Transfer​

A mechanism to lock/mint or swap tokens between blockchains (e.g., BTC → ETH). Unlike traditional bridges, Xythum:

  • Uses FROST threshold signatures (k-of-n nodes) for decentralized custody. Scales with nodes and operates on humongous infrastructure.
  • Guarantees 1 : 1 asset backing via SyncNet-auditable reserves.
  • Achieves 5 – 1 5 s finality through parallelized Schnorr signing rounds.

2.2 Context Transfer​

A protocol for passing arbitrary data (events, state snapshots, function calls) between smart contracts on different chains. Enables:

  • Cross-chain smart contract function calls (e.g., trigger Ethereum function from Solana).
  • Historical state queries (e.g., fetch a contract’s balance 1 00 blocks ago).
  • Conditional multichain logic (e.g., "If Bitcoin hits $ 1 00K, liquidate Solana position").

Technical Architecture​

3. 1 Asset Transfer Implementation​

3. 1 . 1 FROST Threshold Signatures

FROST (Flexible Round-Optimized Schnorr Threshold) enables decentralized signing with:

  • Key Generation: Distributed Key Generation (DKG) across 1 ,000+ nodes.
  • Signing Workflow: 1 . User locks assets on Chain A via Xythum’s Taproot-compatible deposit address (Bitcoin) or gateway contract (EVM). 2. SyncNet logs the lock event as an Intrinsic Transaction. 3. Nodes run FROST’s 2-round signing:
    • **Round 1 **: Nonce generation + commitment broadcast.
    • Round 2: Partial signature computation using secret shares.
    1. Coordinator aggregates signatures into a single 64-byte Schnorr sig. 5 . Relayer submits sig to Chain B’s gateway contract, minting wrapped assets.

Performance:

  • Latency: 5 – 1 5 s (vs. 3+ minutes for MPC-based bridges).
  • Security: 2 5 6-bit EdDSA curves, resistant to Wagner’s attack.

3. 1 .2 SyncNet Ledger

SyncNet provides verifiable proof of asset backing via:

  • UTXO Model: Each transaction (lock, mint, burn) is recorded as:
SyncNet {
    - Ledger (Main Chain)
    - UTXO Database (Pending Orders)
    - Transaction Processor
    - State Synchronizer
    - Consensus Engine
}
Transaction {
    - Intrinsic (Incoming requests)
    - Extrinsic (Outgoing/completion events)
    - System (Network operations)
    - Governance (Protocol updates)
    - fee
    - epoch begin etc
}
  • Consensus: Nodes validate transactions via SPV proofs (Bitcoin) or Merkle-Patricia trie snapshots (EVM).

Context Transfer Implementation​

3.2. 1 Gateway Contracts

Lightweight smart contracts deployed on all supported chains (EVM, Solana, Cosmos, Bitcoin via Tapscript):

contract XythumGateway {
    event CrossChainMessage(bytes calldata, address destGateway);
    
    function send(bytes calldata data, address destGateway) external {
        emit CrossChainMessage(data, destGateway);
    }
    
    function execute(bytes calldata data, bytes calldata frostSig) external {
        require(verifySig(frostSig), "Invalid signature");
        (address target, bytes memory payload) = abi.decode(data, (address, bytes));
        target.call(payload);
    }
}

Workflow:

1 . Emit: Source contract calls XythumGateway.send(calldata, destChainGateway). 2. Consensus: Nodes aggregate the event into a FROST-signed message. 3. Propagate: Relayer submits signature + calldata to destination chain’s gateway. 4. Execute: Gateway decodes calldata and invokes target contract.

Latency: < 5 s for EVM-to-EVM, < 1 5 s for Bitcoin-involved transfers.

3.2.2 XythumVM & DSL

XythumVM: A deterministic VM supporting cross-chain state transitions:

  • Chain Abstraction: Translates chain-specific opcodes (EVM, Solana, Bitcoin Script) into RISC-V instructions.
  • State Proofs: Uses Merkle mountain ranges (MMR) for historical queries (e.g., get_state(chain, address, block)).

XythumDSL: A declarative language for multichain logic:

# Example: Cross-chain liquidation bot
def liquidate_on_btc_high():
    btc_price = Chainlink(Arbitrum).get_price("BTC/USD")
    sol_position = Solana(MangoMarkets).get_position(user_address)

    if btc_price >  1  00000 and sol_position.collateral_ratio <  1  . 1  :
        # Liquidate on Solana if BTC exceeds $ 1  00K
        execute_on(
            Solana,
            "MangoMarkets.liquidate",
            [user_address, sol_position.id]
        )

Compilation:

1 . DSL → Intermediate Representation (IR). 2. IR → RISC-V bytecode with chain-specific adapters. 3. Deployed to XythumVM for cross-chain execution.

3.2.3 Bitcoin Compatibility

For non-smart contract chains (Bitcoin), Xythum uses:

  • Taproot Addresses: Encode context transfer logic in Tapscripts.
  • Time-Locked Transactions: CheckSequenceVerify (CSV) opcodes enforce XythumVM-resolved conditions.

4. Cryptographic Protocols​

4. 1 FROST Optimization for Context Transfers​

  • Batch Signing: Aggregates multiple context transfers into one signature ( 1 ,024 txs/sec per shard).
  • Sharding: BLS-based committee partitioning reduces node workload ( 5 0 nodes/shard).

Security Analysis:

  • Schnorr vs ECDSA: Eliminates signature malleability, enables key aggregation.
  • Adversarial Threshold: Resists up to (k- 1 )/n malicious nodes (k= 5 00, n= 1 ,000).

4.2 SyncNet Consensus​

  • Proof-of-Availability: Nodes stake $XYTHUM tokens to participate in SyncNet validation.
  • Fraud Proofs: Slash misbehaving nodes via ZK validity proofs.

4.3 MPC-as-a-Service (MPCaaS) Architecture​

  • Infrastructure for bootstrapping decentralized networks.
  • Garbled Circuits: Support for private function evaluation (e.g., dark pool order matching).
  • Billing Model: TODO

4.4 Use Case: Decentralized Exchange Bootstrapping​

1 . Startup defines matching engine logic in Xythum DSL. 2. Xythum network provisions 5 00 nodes for order book management. 3. Revenue share: 1 5 % of exchange fees → Xythum treasury.

Components:

  • Protocol Clients: Projects renting Xythum’s MPC slots (e.g., DeFi protocols).
  • Slot Manager: Handles token-based slot allocation (gas fees per cycle).
  • Garbled Circuit Executor: Supports custom MPC logic (e.g., threshold encryption).
  • Relayers: Submit MPC results to target chains.
  • Watcher Services: Monitor chain events for triggering MPC logic.

Flow:

1 . Protocol submits MPC logic (e.g., multisig wallet rules) in DSL. 2. Xythum compiles logic to RISC-V and charges gas fees. 3. MPC nodes execute logic, generating FROST-signed outputs. 4. Relayers submit results to destination chains (e.g., Solana). 5 . SyncNet logs MPC operations for transparency.

Use Cases

** 5 . 1 Cross-Chain Perpetual Futures**​

  • Position opened on Arbitrum, collateralized by Bitcoin.
  • Liquidation triggered via XythumDSL when BTC price (from Chainlink) drops 1 0% on Ethereum.

** 5 .2 Multichain NFT Collections**​

def update_nft_metadata():
    eth_balance = Ethereum(Wallet).balance_of(user, "ETH")
    sol_balance = Solana(Wallet).balance_of(user, "SOL")
    total = eth_balance + sol_balance
    if total >  1  000:
        set_metadata(NFT, "tier", "platinum")

** 5 .3 Decentralized MPC-as-a-Service**​

1 . Dev defines MPC logic in XythumDSL (e.g., t-of-n wallet recovery). 2. Xythum compiles it to RISC-V bytecode. 3. Protocol rents node capacity via $XYTHUM tokens (cost = cycles × gas price).

** 5 .4 Decentralized Bitcoin Lending**​

1 . User locks BTC via Taproot time-locked address. 2. Xythum mints zkBTC on Ethereum with rate model:

interest_rate = 0.0 5  × utilization / ( 1   − utilization)
  1. Liquidation via FROST-signed Bitcoin transaction after 24h.

** 5 . 5 Chain-Agnostic Lending**​

  • Deposit BTC on Bitcoin as collateral.
  • Borrow USDC on Polygon via SyncNet-verified proof of collateral.
  • Repayment automatically unlocks BTC via FROST-signed release.

** 5 .6 Cross-Chain DAO Governance**​

  • Proposal created on Ethereum.
  • Snapshot of token holders taken across 5 chains via XythumVM.
  • Vote execution enforced on all chains via gateway contracts.

** 5 .7 Bitcoin-to-DeFi Swaps**​

1 . Lock BTC in Taproot address (SPV proof logged on SyncNet). 2. Mint wrapped BTC on Avalanche via FROST-signed minting. 3. Swap to AVAX using Trader Joe’s liquidity pool.

Diagrams Describing Context Transfers​

Diagram 1
Diagram 2
Diagram 3
Diagram 4